Nvme for os reddit ssd. The biggest benefit with SSD's is having bigger models.

Nvme for os reddit ssd Thanks for any advice. It's already got a 256GB NVME in one of the M. While the OS isn't going to show a great deal of noticeable difference in most cases either, it's going to make more of an impact to use the faster drive for the OS than games, especially if all your scratch/temp files are on it like I am currently using the Geekworm kit includes the bottom NVMe hat along with the power supply and a metal case. A good NVMe drive is vastly faster than a good SATA drive. - Be warned, after upgrading to an Optane boot drive, every other computer will just feel slow (like my $3k Alienware gaming laptop). Though it's generally safe to clone a SATA SSD to an NVMe M. I work with different SSD's each day, and I have a really really hard time noticing the difference between SATA and NVME. Since you do some video editing, an NVME SSD would be the best option for you, since video editing is one of the tasks that can make full use of an NVME SSD's speed. If you have Sierra / Windows 8. Right but a standard ssd will bottleneck windows if anything is happening in the background where a nvme doesn’t … i found that out because of my 6 pcs all 10th and 11th gen Intel I had one that had a regular ssd with windows and I hated my life as soon as a update came switched to a nvme and runs smooth as butter Although at 3+GB/sec, we're pushing half the speed of virtual memory on most modern CPUs (read/write to disk cache - I consider this speed to be the OS virtual memory speed, as this gets the OS to thrash it's normal lookup and locking- this is around 6-7GB/sec on Linux, Windows and Solaris on a few generations back Xeons. The Firecuda SSDs have a great TBW better than WD and Samsung. I have a 500gb nvme SSD as a boot drive and 2 1tb nvme and 2 500gb SATA ssds for games and everything else. Would a WD SN770 m. In most cases the difference between a game running on a NVMe SSD or a SATA is negligible. 0 NVMe SSDs would still offer a noticeable improvement vs a SATA based one even with just gaming. Boot drive tho, you will save a few The 905P, despite only being PCIe3, is a big jump in tactile performance over a regular NVME SSD. My OS is currently installed on a Samsung 850 evo SATA SSD, and I'm curious whether I should move it to my new SN750 NVMe drive. One thing I am scratching my head on currently with my new build including an i5 12600K and a Z690 Board (Gigabyte Aorus Z690 Elite AX DDR4) are the 4 NVME SSD sockets it offers. 999% of the time anyway. Ssd is still aceptable especialy if its much cheaper then nvme. Should I run the OS from the NVMe? I was thinking that the NVMe would have more available resources/performance for games as a dedicated game-drive, since it wouldn't have to run the OS in the background. But not Fanless. I want to install Windows on the NVMe, but it shows as drive 1, being the… Otherwise, you would need to clone your drive, which I generally don't recommend. Put everything important into the SSD, put things like songs/videos/photos in the HDD. the damage and heat part is just wrong lol, and you don't even need an NVMe. The problem is that no matter which slot on my mobo (rog z390-f) I use for the nvme, it limits my gpu to x8 native rather than the x16. I can nuke either OS and re-install any new OS and not worry about my data. NVME is what Flash storage was meant to be used with. Boot a Windows installation medium, on the first page of the setup press shift + F10, a command prompt should appear. I was planning on utilizing the faster NVME for storing games, and a slower SATA SSD for storing the OS. NVME are better but HDDs are so awful at random read/write compared to any SSD the big jump is from HDD to SATA SSD. I already had a 500gb Crucial P3 Plus that is a Gen4x4 QLC drive and it works without issues. Now i have 2 SSD and an NVME. So I cloned my previous SSD on to the new one using the NVMe SSD to USB adapter. 2 (7000 MB/s) With a third-party NVMe SSD, you HAVE to be running macOS High Sierra or Windows 8. To add on to what others say, you should 2000% definitely have your OS on your SSD. Since they were expensive, people got a small ssd for the os and used cheap hdds for programs. Crucial p5 1 tb WD SN570 1 tb Crucial SSD has better read and write speeds compared to sn570 UGreen 40gbps NVME/SSD Enclosure (CM642) Lexar NM790 4TB NVME SSD Background: I've recently purchased the UGreen 40Gbps SSD NVME Enclosure based on the ASMedia ASM2464PD chipset. I tried nvmefix and some nvme drivers but that didn't work, plus most of the solutions are for clover. 5” SSD - Metadata (it’s always best to keep your metadata on a separate drive) 8 x 10TB WD Reds - Content Storage Definitely install windows in the S70 gammix and put it in the 4. Also, the older the machine, the less likely it'll benefit from the speed differences of a traditional SATA ssd vs NVME. Now this is no longer valid since ssds are fairly cheap. Or 2) stick with just the 2TB NVMe for OS/programs/games + HDDs for files, then add Dec 19, 2024 · If your tests show high read/write speeds on the main OS drive during video renders and for VMs, I'd try the NVMe Gen. I initially got it for gaming but should I install my OS on it as well as stoage for gaming downloads? My OS is currently on an older SSD that's like 250GB so is it worth switching? Thanks in advance! Os speed comes down to random read and write performance. Now the question:. You will not be disappointed with NVME, but a SATA SSD will do just fine. Depends whats more important to you, you wont really feel the massive jump in responsiveness within the OS when going ssd -> nvme you do when upgrading a hdd to an ssd, but it sure will improve load times in games. I have three M. Id say put your os and main games on the nvme, and smaller games or games you dont play as much on a sata. Would also be rather pointless here as NVMe vs Sata won't make a noticeable difference if your workload is booting OS and/or loading games and programs. I’m building a pc for both workstation and gaming. Nothing broke and I corrected the mount, but I'm worried I could have damaged it internally. I'm not sure on CPU impact so much, although SATA drives can not reach NVMe levels by any means (but NVMe is more efficient). Funny how this post pops up today as my nvme had a stroke. I have 3 hard drives and one SSD (nvme) for caching, was looking for the best way to install the OS on a second new SSD, and retain the files and configuration. Now, for using a cache-drive, this is dependant on the OS/Raid/Storage you decide to use. I would like to copy the content of my 512GB SSD to my new one without losing data or needing to reinstall anything. I know it's possible, but there are numerous software options available, and some of them have a lot of ads (which is not always Thank you, u/fish_taco_pirate. And that is what i did with my 12th Gen NUC - i do have 256 SSD for Proxmox OS and 2TB Samsung EVO to handle VM/CT maind drives with Extra storage being Virtualized TrueNAS Scale with 18TB Mirrored. Hasn't changed much. Under boot section, look at uefi hard drive priority, and make sure the first drive is your boot drive. If this is the route you wish to take, there are free programs such as Macrium Reflect you can use. And in that video He mentions that OS will run of SSD and all VM/CT will live on NVMe. Nvme was no longer recognisable by bios but other storage Nvme drives were, 5 minutes later when removing the ssd it was still too hot to touch. Since the wear is spread across a bigger number of bytes, you will experience less degradation. I'm looking for the best 1TB or 2TB NVME SSD for my Odroid H3+ Pentium Silver N6005-based single board computer, for OS installs/data storage. Probably never notice the difference though. Any ssd is good enough for a game drive. DRAM cahce'd SSD's would be better if they are an option for you. Anything faster than a SATA SSD is pretty much always a waste for anyone's OS drive. 2 SATA SSD (I use one, it was bought when NVMe SSDs were noticeably more expensive), which would have more or less the same characteristics as a 2. Been getting nowhere with this and just wondering if anyone has experience and could possibly help me out so I can get it installed properly. I tried the method in HA guide (flash the OS to drive, connect pi via ethernet and connect the NVMe via USB then boot up. But im curious why you are interested in doing this? If you are filling up your 500gb NVME ssd and need more space you can usually just add a large capacity secondary drive to hold your files, like a 2-4tb SATA ssd. You just want good read (500mb of sata ssd is absolutely fine) and the instant seek time, which all SSD's have. Faster boot times aren't really a benefit, because you should hardly ever be rebooting the NAS. Data is more important than the OS. 5 months as the Windows 11 OS before giving me the occasional BSOD's. The best way I found was to remove the Windows drive and install Pop OS using the clean install option, then reinsert the Windows drive and boot like normal to whichever you Yes, it's possible. Both SSD have 4TB also the NVME with the same Size. While I got my pi working I will probably reload the OS as the first try was merely for testing to see if it works without issues. 0 NVME, much less faster NVMEs. I use the Samsung 970 EVO Plus in both the onboard Aug 7, 2020 · So 1) add a 500gb 2. Most games barely show any noticeable difference between a SATA drive and a 3. Never use HDD for your OS, the boot time difference will be in terms of minutes, even a budget SSD will take seconds for your computer to boot up whereas an HDD will take minutes. 5 inch SSD. For games, there’s almost no loss having them on a sata drive vs nvme. I do notice more defective drives among the NVME drives, however. Looking at the schematics in the manual, one is bound to the CPU, the other 3 to the Z690 Chipset. When you do the clean install, disconnect your older SSD. NVME as a protocol also allows simultaneous data transfers (multiple queues) so storage is less constrained if multiple VMs are hammering the storage, SATA basically only has one queue. 0 but I don't do anything besides games and occasional Photoshop work. 2 to add to my build but I don't know which option would be better for my needs. Right now I have a Kingston A400 240GB SATA SSD for OS and apps and a Seagate Barracuda 1TB HDD for games, movies, etc. Currently I have one NVME M2 WD SN550 1TB as my primary OS + gaming drive but I'm running out of space because modern games take a lot space. I'm buying a 2 tb NVME, and currently have my OS on a 500 gb SSD. Currently it is not formatted. Also, forget about getting a 500gb ssd. I'd like to test if it still works before installing the OS (Windows 11). 2 nvme drive be good for a os boot or startup drive? It doesn't have DRAM cache, but if you have one it wouldn't be bad, just not optimal. This unit doesn't support Gen 4 PCIe. The other method I've seen is to run dd to clone the old disk to the new one but I'm concerned the storage device config will get messed up since the device node will change from /dev I have a 512GB NVMe SSD that contains the operating system, and I've purchased a 2TB 980 Pro SSD. 2 drive speeds don't waste them on the OS drive. Indeed am aware of the DSM is installed on every drive in your system situation. I want to get another 1tb drive for extra space but dont know if i should A) get one with dram and transfer my os over to it since i keep reading that its better for long term use OR B) keep using my sn550 for the os and just get whatever is cheaper since i will only be using it for extra You would be correct. I moved things around so the each is in its proper gen slot. Should i bother reinstalling windows on the new drive or is the difference too marginal to even bother? Or you can use an Enterprise-class NVMe 4 or 5 drive to get the sustained performance, but ofc those are much more expensive, and you’d need a NVMe to U. The main point of using a ssd was the difference from a hdd to ssd. 2 slot on mobo and then use spam del key into uefi/bios. Is that strategy wrong? Should it be the other way around? Recently got a new 1TB NVMe m. If on a ssd 120 then install alll programs on other drive as it ask you of so. The DC5800X is not a big jump over the 905P. The installer boots but it doesn't detect the laptops SSD (it's a sk hynix bc711). 0 bus). I realize this is a niche benefit, but I struggle to think of when I would ever want to do this. Should I install my os onto the new drive? Or should I keep using the mx500 for it and the 960gb one just for games?. Lots of files, lots of drives, each categorised. Also stop saving windows files on the 120 drive as with time windows save systems files often and it increase the size of files on your os drive. Looking for confirmation on the possibility of successfully performing the initial DSM 7 OS installation on the NVMe SSD RAID1 array, prior to installing regular HDDs in the unit. Between SATA & NVME, the latter can perform more commands at one time compared to SATA's old AHCI protocol which was created for mechanical HDDs. Its usually easier to re-install the OS on the new drive than it is to migrate (move) the OS. So I upgraded my old SSD to a Samsung Evo 970 Plus almost a month ago on August 1st. Here is HDD vs SATA 2. 2 and sata ssd and it didnt find much different, and shockingly the sata ssd even won in certain cases -- again this wasn't a speed test but the usage by actual games, softwares, etc. Now a SATA SSD and a Nvme SSD both are based on the same internals, they connect to your PC different. Nvme usually is FAR faster than SATA, but that difference is not very noticeable. 1 or later. My question is that should I get a 500gb Samsung 980pro just to run the operating system and maybe for storing the programs (idk if I should do that, but if I did I’d keep the programs storage folders in seperate drives etc steam) or should I I got a good deal on a gen 4 nvme ssd recently but my PC came with gen 3 and slots for both. Samsung 500GB Evo 870 2. It has Windows installed and all my games and programs. I changed the DVD Drive with an DVD SSD Case. But that's for NVMe - with SATA you don't have HMB, but on the other hand SATA (w/AHCI) is much more limited in what it can do IOPS and queues. Gen4 500gb auros ssd with the copper heatsink as boot drive, thermal pads had completely dried and crashed midway through playing mw19. Don't get me wrong, a 1TB NVMe drive makes sense for the OS even if you don't partition it and it also stores games, documents, etc. 2 drives in my May 23, 2022 · Like others have said, if I was upgrading to a newer version of Windows, needed a fresh install of Windows, or wanted a larger OS drive, then I would upgrade to a NVMe SSD. On most (all?) NAS brands the OS is automatically installed on every drive (as RAID 1) when the drive is initialized. On the previous SSD Pop OS 19. The best SATA drives are better than the worst NVMe drives. The difference between SATA and NVMe drives in real day to day use is immeasurable. well those people were wrong, and i rarely see people say that. The biggest benefit with SSD's is having bigger models. Having it go from NVME SSD to RAM would be a 10x bandwidth improvement from the viewpoint of SATA SSD vs NVME SSD then back into itself for its own cache. M. Wanting to put the OS on the NVMe and as windows only takes 128gb, I was wondering if it was fine to put games in addition to the OS or if there’s a risk of faillure / slowing down the OS? 15 votes, 12 comments. . 0 m. All things being equal, I want to maximize space on my NVMe drives for games. The Seagate Firecuda 530 is high endurance and very fast. Works for me. I know this is a fairly over-asked question but I currently have a nvme drive 250Gb just for my OS and an SSD for my apps and games. Peak transfer of an NVME SSD can reach gigabytes/second, most SATA SSDs are going to be 400-500 megabyes/second. Enter the command "diskpart", in diskpart type "list disk" and note the disk number of your NVMe drive (probably 0). But if capacity and budget is the primary concern, a higher capacity SATA SSD will serve you better than a smaller capacity but faster NVMe drive. Also NVMe's without DRAM will use Host Memory Buffer (HMB) which is a good in between solution that is still very fast. 5 drive as your Windows boot and VM drive. Hello there I just bought my first nvme drive (1 tb samsung 980 evo). but I can concur, I've actually read an article with tests on real world usage & even boot time with an NVMe m. NAScompares has a good video on: Asustor NAS - Using the NVMe SSD Bays for Storage So I am trying to install MacOS Big Sur on my Dell Inspiron 16 plus with opencore. Many of the fastest NVME enclosure on the market are based on this chipset but almost all of them are huge. 5" SSD vs pcie 3 nvme. 5" SATA SSD but in a smaller format. 2 adapter as well, so not an option most home users will consider. 2 slot closest to the CPU socket. HDD_____SATA SSD_NVME The reason nvme are "so much faster" is the continuous read/write, however the random read/write is what makes SSDs snappy and what helps streams assets quickly. I've slightly bent my brand new nvme SSD during the build. And between ssd and lets say hdd diference is night and day and these days hdd should not be used as os or gaming drive, its still good for movies, tv shows, backups, surveilance and such. I got my OS installed on an older 960 (or 970) samdung ssd with 500gb. I can always delete the games I have on that drive, or just transfer the OS to the NVME. Note that your OS is not stored on the SSD, only applications so the benefits are rarely huge. I went with a Samsung 970 but basically every ssd is way faster than 1000mb/s so you should prioritise endurance. Basically instead it uses something in the range of like 50MB of your system's memory instead. Used to have 120gb nvme as a boot drive but that thing nearly got completely full from all of the updates. a western digital green almost certainly is DRAMless and pretty crappy in general. Unless you work doing something that requires transferring massive amounts of data daily, you do not need an NVMe drive. I'm using the 500GB Western Digital Black SN750 NVME M. I bought a 500Gb samsumg 970 evo plus NVMe SSD and a 500gb samsumg 860 evo SATA SSD. I'm not really sure if I need 4. You should get a 1tb instead. SSDs get more viable every year with reduced pricing and increased storage For most NAS software, you will get limited benefit of using a SSD for the OS drive, as, the relevant parts of the OS are loaded into RAM once its up and running. My use case is mainly web browsing and gaming. NVME as Parity and both SSD as Datadrives. I recently bought a 1TB NVMe SSD and wasntold in order to boot it, I need to install windows. If the rest of the setup can't keep up, then I'm not sure NVME is really going to offer much improvement. Windows should activate with your code automatically. I personally have 3tb of nvme and 3 tb of sata. 2 SSD, in my opinion I would install a fresh Win10 OS and drivers for this scenario. Games don't really benefit from an NVME drive right now, although they may in the future if DirectStorage becomes widely adopted. Its simply how the storage works physically. The NVMe has a much higher throughput than Sata3 (uses 4 of the 16 channels on the PCIe 3. The cheapest 2. When ssds were new, they were expensive but the benefit of having os on it was found out. Hi, I've got a 1 TB M2 NVMe disk and a 250 GB SSD. Once you're happy that it boots correctly, you can re-connect your old drive. Some of the fastest nvme out right now are DRAMless though. Last year, my first 4TB version lasted for 3. Would it be worth it to transfer my OS to the nvme? My 500 gb ssd has about 5 gb left in space and I've heard it decreases efficiency if you have less than like 25% of space less. 0 or earlier installed, you will need make sure to make a proper USB installer beforehand. NVME is obviously faster, but a sata will be fine as well. there is a difference when it comes to SSDS. 2 SSD (without heatsink) as my OS drive with an idle temp of ~37c along with a 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND SATA SSD, and 2 x 1TB WD Green 7200RPM HDD's in RAID0 as secondary storage drives in my build. Best combination is a NVME SSD for OS and games and a Mechanical HDD for storing everything else such as movies, music etc That's not entirely correct. I returned it to Amazon and my 2nd Crucial P3 lasted for one year as my music storage drive. 2 NVME. The reason old systems had a small ssd and a large hdd was the cost. Greetings, I’m not asking wether to turn pagefile on or off/or wondering the amount to use I’m fine with the system managing that. 2 is the form-factor, SATA and PCI-E/NVMe are interfaces. 2 nvme SSDs for my upcoming build. Probably worth paying the very small amount more for nvme for the boot drive just to make it neater, less cables etc. They use them as dedicated scratch drives for their video editors or whatever. Once it freezes, no input devices are recognized anymore. That said, I put all my data (docs, files, music etc) on a sata drive as it's easier to pull out of I want to. After moving things, PC still boots up fine from the OS on the gen3 drive. You absolutely can have an M. You can measure it, however when compared to a HDD it's negligible Iam using Unraid with the Fujitsu Esprimo Q920. Nowadays there's probably less difference in I was wondering if there's a way to move the OS to a brand new SSD (TS-473). Use case. I personally installed my first NVMe barely weeks ago as well (1 TB Samsung Pro 970) and I turned it into my OS drive, while installing there just a handful of "heavy weight" games (Warhammer II, XCOM 2, Star Citizen). DRAM is more useful for SSD/storage performance in that case. I’ve also made a small partition dedicated to transcoding. I currently have a 500gb nvme sn550 i use for a boot drive along with a 2tb hdd for games and whatnot. Also for the OS you don't need the fastest SSD as you need it to load the OS and that's all. The issue I have with this is the NVMe drive may not be fully utilized since the cloned system was originally setup to run on a SATA SSD. A SATA drive will be pretty much the same for the average gamer. loading screens An SSD with DRAM will generally consume a bit more watts because it has a discrete memory chip. 2 slots, but I'm thinking that if I want to run a RAID 1 setup, I'm going to have to use 2 identical NVME drives, meaning the OS will have to run on a SATA drive. Nvme will be faster then ssd, its not night and day difference but its there. 1 nvme for Win OS and apps, 1 SSD for data from both OS's and game library and 1 Nvme for Linux. PCIe 3. IE: Would there be any dependencies with in the OS (SSD), that would impede the loading of Games stored on the NVMe or would having them on separate drives, actually result in a performance boost? My current OS drive is a 512GB Samsung 850 PRO Specs: OS: Windows 10 Pro 64-bit CPU: i7-8700K CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-U12A My plex setup: Samsung 500GB Evo 970 NVME - OS & Plex Install. I started off with 2 ssds in RAID for redudancy but eventually decided that was massive overkill so now just have one. If your nvme is far superior in this category, you’ll notice a small improvement. Jun 29, 2021 · I would recommend the NVMe for the OS drive. Install your os on the drive you want nvme are the best for os. Just plug the nvme onto your other m. Upgrading to an NVME would be faster loading times if you keep your games on it, but that's depending on what games you're storing. Hopefully ADM is smart enough to run the OS from any installed NVMe drives instead of running it from one the other drives. 5" SSD vs the most expensive pcie 5 nvme right now will show no noticeable difference in game loading time and windows. But i didnt hear the Fan, its very quiet. Esprimo with 16GB and with an i5. 5 inch 1TB sSD and a WD black 1tb m. Plus you get more storage for the same money. I tend to still isolate windows install in a smaller partition on the main disk (generally 220/250gb suffice), format the rest of the drive for data/games. That is the only reason. Basically, no. Yeh, I am surprised to see so many NVME SSDs (the majority?) without DRAM like Samsung 980, WD SN750s and SN770 Blacks, Crucial P-series, etc NVME SSDs all being DRAMless SSDs, and only a fewer top of the line stuff like the 980 Pro having DRAM. I use a 3 drive system. Or you can use an Enterprise-class NVMe 4 or 5 drive to get the sustained performance, but ofc those are much more expensive, and you’d need a NVMe to U. 10 was running fine, but now on a new install I get random freezes which lead to either an automatic reboot or me having to power down the system. There is no reason to buy a 500gb ssd and just install os and a 1tb ssd for programs. My drives: 120GB Intenso SSD (r: 520MB/s w:480MB/s) 500GB Samsung SSD 860 EVO (r:550MB/s w:520MB/s) 1TB Samsung 980 PRO M. Having it all together just makes OS reinstalls a bit more annoying because you need to backup your data (well, you should always have backups of your important data anyways, but game downloads are often slow and write a lot of GB onto your drives so if you can Hello, gettin a new pc. I like to keep my boot drive separate just to keep things organized. It's kind of weird to worry about back doors from Samsung, I mean the whole problem starts with not having anyway control over your phone to do any mounts or encryption you want, the manufacturer (most likely Samsung if Android, and probably Google too anyway) has access to EVERYTHING, from the secure boot keys to root in the OS while we as the owners of the device have nothing. Even after stressing the gpu it stays at x8. I’m just curious if it’s better for me to set my main drive with windows 10 installed to have the page file or my secondary SSD where I run my games and movies? I use to dual boot with Pop OS on a 2 TB 970 EVO, and Windows which was on a 500 GB 960 EVO. and of those that would, most probably are already well aware of this option. Had a good offer on amazon and I decided to purchase it. Bit of a tech breakdown: an nvme interface has multiple buses of memory transfer while a sata interface only has one, this means your data uses multiple "roads" to travel as compared to one, so your transfer rates will excel, but for gaming it's absolutely unnecessary as the game does not need to load lots of data from a drive so much as render tons of data in memory and vram, thus a sata From what I've seen online, the simplest way to do this is to run a clean Proxmox install on the NVMe disk and copy /etc/pve from the SATA SSD to the NVMe disk. I'm upgrading from a SATA SSD to an NVMe SSD. Windows as option to do saving files in the seting menu. Hi folks! I'm migrating from a 4790k to a Ryzen 5 5600x, and I'm adding a second NVMe drive now that my mobo supports it. "Transferring" in this case means moving files from one NVMe SSD to another, or making a hard-copy of a file on the same drive since, as you said, you would otherwise be bottlenecked by the read/write speed of the non-NVMe SSD / mechanical drive. Will running the OS on a SATA drive affect performance in any way compared to on a NVME drive? It shouldn't right? Doesn't have to be NVME. You could even mirror them for less than NVME. I'm adding an NVMe, and will probably move the A400 to a laptop. i have a WD Blue 2. These OS's do not have a native NVMe driver (the original Apple drives are PCIe SATA before any asks), and Nvme>sata in speed. Ideally, use 4 drives/sources: (1) express card for OS up to 1TB (2) express card for current projects at least 1TB (3) express card for cache 250GB is enough (4) one cheap, small SSD for final For archives and backups you can dump everything in those big, cheap HDD’s - just get external reader and copy the files over night. However if you're dealing with big project files like that regularly, it can prematurely wear out any low quality SSD. The nvme/sata is more of a recent difference. I was then told it is not recommended to clone Windows from an old but to use a fresh new install of Windows. I ran the performance test again in Samsung Magician today and noticed the random read write is much lower now . I'm planning to buy a good and reliable drive 1TB or 2TB. An SSD is a solid state drive. Wouldn't it be wiser to put it on the small, slower 120GB SSD where just the system would be on and the NVMe could be used purely for games and data? Ty for your insights in advance. my computer actually boots up about 4-5 seconds faster on the 2. Even the people who 'need' m. Is it worth the time and effort to swap the OS from the gen 3 drive to the Gen 4 drive? The Gen 4 I currently have my OS on a 250gb crucial mx500 ssd but I'm getting a new 960gb nvme ssd. I have found installing Pop with the Windows drive installed can cause issues. I would recommend your 512 GB be setup as a fast storage or data archive drive. I had NVME on my X99 board which would have been late 2014 I think? (I think I picked mine up in 2015). I'm currently running Windows 10 on a SanDisk Ultra II 480GB (DRAM SSD), and I just bought a 1TB WD SN550, mostly for games. I currently use a 1TB Firecuda 510 PCIe Gen 3 only for the OS and I use 3 4TB WD SN850X PCIe Gen 4 for games and video editing. Getting an NVME will future proof you for 1-2 years (assuming you aren't going to be buying the latest and greatest AAA games and filling it up quickly) That thing is 20 bucks. SATA SSD as a boot drive is plenty enough at the moment. Just to Clear something I've bought 2 m. The OS stays in RAM 99. 5 SDD for OS and core programs (not games) + 2TB NVMe + HDDs for simple file storage. If you have none of those needs, then just leave things alone. ytzj xhqv jmi jdu zfno fzmo cio kmzboph adtr pqly